HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Complete Work
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Complete Work
HLT317v
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 1
Compare and contrast the characteristics between qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. How would you apply each type of research methodology in your workplace?
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 2
Choose a health care case study on ethical practices form your work environment or from a library article. Explain the basic ethical considerations in terms of informed consent, beneficence, truth telling, and deception.
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment (Benchmark Assignment) Collaborative Learning Community: Consumerism in Health Care Paper Details:
This is a benchmark assignment. This is a CLC assignment.
Topic Introduction and Summary:
Include:
- An explanation to what research shows regarding customer perception of health care over the past 5 years.
- An introduction to the topic and its significance to customer service or consumerism in allied health care.
- What does the research forecast as the trends, for the next 5 years, to better meet consumer needs?
Methodology:
Provide an overview of the scope of the study in the chosen article by explaining data collection and where to find the data.Describe the process used to determine the validity and reliability of the research findings to support evidence-based practices.
Results:
Differentiate between the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the data described in the article in terms of descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, or both.Determine if you have enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the study?
Conclusion:
Summarize your findings of the research as it relates to where we are in health care delivery today. What actions to you see that need to take place to meet the future needs of health care delivery?
Assignment Requirements:
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turn it in.
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment 2 Literature Review Draft – Peer Review Details:
In this assignment, you will conduct peer reviews on the “Literature Review Draft” assignment from Topic 2.
- Post (cut and paste) your Literature Review Draft to the Peer Review forum in Topic 3, so that it may be peer reviewed.
- You should label your paper with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).
- Your instructor will assign each student two papers to peer review.
- When conducting the peer review, utilize the grading rubric in the “Literature Review Draft” assignment, the “HLT-317V Peer Review Worksheet,” and “HLT-317V Peer Review Guidelines” as resources.
- You may want to modify your paper according to the recommendations from your peers as you feel appropriate.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.You are not required to submit this assignment to Turn it in.
HLT 317v Grand Canyon Week 3 Peer Review Forum
Post the rough draft of your essay as a reply to this thread. You should label your paper and the subject line of your reply with your first name and last name (e.g., Karen Palmer’s Paper).Review the first draft of the person who posted his/her response directly below yours in the Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted. Complete the “HLT-317V Peer Review Worksheet.”Copy and paste the completed “HLT-317V Peer Review Worksheet” to the Peer Review Forum as a “reply” to the initial post of your peer’s first draft. Do not post the worksheet as an attachment.
View this related topic here:HLT 310V Week 4 Complete Assignments
